Not So Disappointed!!

New to the site? Introduce yourself here.
Freejax
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:39 pm

Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Freejax »

So I went to register my 1967 Corvair 500 in Canada and they said it has never been registered or passed an out of province inspection in Canada. This is good news because that means it has never been driven in Canada and it has been here for about 20 years. But wait it gets better the last place it was registered was the nice dry desert like state of Nevada, this makes up for only being a 500 and having the 95 HP motor. This also means that the odometer that says 11332 miles may be accurate. I don't mean to gloat but I just wanted to share my new found knowledge with a group of people that would appreciate the info like I did.
I think I will try to not rebuild the bottom end of this car right away, I will port and polish the heads, get some headers, roller rockers, rebuild the carbs, get grooved oil pan and valve covers and put separate air filters on each carb. What do you guys think, will this improve my HP.
Thanks Freeman
Attachments
100_2849.JPG
Happy Building all!
User avatar
classicchevyowner7
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 9:34 pm
Location: Central Georgia

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by classicchevyowner7 »

It should increase hp some, with the air filters because the stock housing restricts air some.
- Allen
User avatar
bbodie52
Corvair of the Month
Corvair of the Month
Posts: 12140
Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:33 pm
Location: Lake Chatuge Hayesville, NC
Contact:

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by bbodie52 »

:tu: :clap: :funnypost: :thumbsupwink: Maybe this is the next best thing to picking up a new Corvair at the Lambrecht auction in Pierce Nebraska. The apparent ultra-low mileage and minimal exposure to hostile weather and road salt may prove to have given you an almost-new Corvair as the basis for your restoration and upgrade project!

:think: I would do some significant research regarding performance tuning the Corvair. Some of the upgrades you mentioned are pretty exotic and expensive. Depending on your plans for how this car is to be driven, I'm not sure that the expensive cylinder head work and roller rockers are really appropriate for a street-based vehicle — if that is your targeted intention for this car. If you define your intended use of this car, Corvair Forum contributors like "Unsafe" (Kevin Willson) could probably provide you with recommendations that would produce the best engine configuration for your intended uses. All aspects of your engine build should be carefully planned and designed to meet your targeted usage. The engine components should complement each other. I suspect that even stock large-valve, large exhaust port 4-carburetor 140 hp heads will out-perform any porting and polishing, special valve grind, roller rocker-equipped head treatment you could imagine for your 95 hp base engine cylinder heads. There are many approaches to an intake system, including turbocharging, Weber 3-barrel carbs, a stock 140 hp 4x1 configuration, a center-mounted 4-barrel, Electronic Fuel Injection, etc. What is the best approach? Again, it depends on your intended use. Roller rockers might make sense for a high-rev racing engine, but will this expensive modification pay off on the street, or will they only amount to expensive valve train "jewelry" that will never approach their design advantages? Every performance engine should be planned from the intake to the exhaust and everything in-between to perform well for the intended use. The engine built for drag racing will likely be quite different from the road racing engine or an engine built for off-road racing in a sand rail. The optimum engine for street use might be a mildly tuned and carefully-assembled engine with an almost stock bottom-end, a mild cam, dual exhaust (not tubular headers) and perhaps Electronic Fuel Injection (EFI) and a computer-controlled Distributorless Ignition System (DIS). A higher compression ratio may make sense in racing, but too high in an air-cooled engine may begin to degrade reliability, which is not something you need in a road race. On the street, a stock, relatively low compression ratio may provide adequate performance and better, more economical operation on the street with modern fuels — especially if it is managed by a sensor-based, computer controlled EFI/DIS system. Tubular headers may prove to be too loud on the street, and their disadvantages in having to remove or cut the lower shrouds may "swing the pendulum" away from the practical for street usage, and more toward the impractical that would be better-suited for the race track.

Most engine modifications are compromises made with cost, performance and reliability. Some experimentation is usually involved, but you can avoid mistakes by listening to others who have already been down that path. You may find that reading the following book will be revealing as you make your plans for modifying, improving and restoring your Corvair...

If you don't own a copy of this book, I would strongly suggest that you buy a copy and read it to help you with your Corvair upgrades and improvement investments. I have owned the earlier version of this book since 1970, and bought the updated version when it was published last year. It is filled with a great deal of informative material that has been developed and collected over decades of Corvair ownership and racing. At $21.25 it is a good Corvair "bible" that will help you to make educated, informed decisions for your Corvair before you actually spend time and money.

:link: http://www.amazon.com/Performance-Corva ... th+emerson

Image

Image

The suspension, brake system, etc. in a Late Model 1965-69 Corvair are nearly identical in a 500, Monza or Corsa, so a clean body and chassis can be a solid basis for almost any final car configuration and performance tuning you might imagine. Some careful research and planning coupled with listening to "lessons learned" and advice from others who have been down a similar path can lead you toward the best-possible outcome that is satisfying to you.
Brad Bodie
Lake Chatuge, North Carolina
Image 1966 Corvair Corsa Convertible
Freejax
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Freejax »

Thanks for taking your time to reply with good advice, I really appreciate your knowledge. I have ordered that book but i don't have it yet, I can't wait to read it because that is the hardest part is to decide on what to do and keep with the plan. My plan is to have a little more get up on the street and that would make me happy, oh and plus reliability.
Happy Building all!
Freejax
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Freejax »

100_2876.JPG
This is the engine I am dealing with right now, any improvement would make me happy. haha
Happy Building all!
Freejax
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Freejax »

100_2888.JPG
A bigger picture.
Happy Building all!
User avatar
Scott H
Site Admin
Posts: 4298
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Hesperia, CA

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Scott H »

Looks like a really nice straight car. I personally like the 500's. You hardly ever see them.
Scott
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
User avatar
Skrain
Posts: 510
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:49 pm
Location: Monticello, Kentucky

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Skrain »

I would consider the grooved oil pan and valve covers from Clark's for better cooling to start with. Put them on, run it for a while, and THEN see how much more you want to invest.
1964 Monza Spyder Turbo Convertible.
1949 Ford 8N Tractor
2006 Toyota Tacoma TRD Off-Road 4X4 Pickup
aslondon
Posts: 21
Joined: Sat Jan 25, 2014 9:46 pm
Location: Monticello, Florida

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by aslondon »

An old saying when I used to work around the CanAm cars, It wasn't cubic inches that won races, it was cubic dollars. Everything depends what your goal is and how much you can afford to throw at it. Both are mutually important concepts.

Al
User avatar
flat6_musik
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:03 am
Location: Hesperia, CA

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by flat6_musik »

Freejax wrote:......any improvement would make me happy. haha
Image

I think tightening that oil drain plug would be a certain improvement! heh heh But seriously, really nice score! A rust-free 'vair is like gold.

As far as the engine upgrades, figure out what your total dollar amount is that you want to spend, then you can start creating a list of things to start on like ignition, a hotter cam etc. Hopefully your pistons/rings are healthy and sealing well.
User avatar
viewmaster
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:34 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by viewmaster »

Welcome Freejax. That looks like a solid car. Its nice to see more '500's here. I have a '65 sedan '500, and it still gets the "thumbs up" when i drive it. Even tho its the working mans car. Still cool!

You wouldnt be able to post a pic of your firewall area, without rear seat back, would you? I am trying to figure out what was stock on mine, since the previous owner did some kooky stuff in there.

Thanks in advance,

-m
'65 '500' Sedan 110 PG
'65 Monza Sedan "Turbo'd" 110 SU conversion 4sp Manual'
1966-Corsa-GT-180
Posts: 346
Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:51 am
Location: Pierce County, Washington, U.S.A.

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by 1966-Corsa-GT-180 »

I'd suggest you replace the push rod O rings, oil cooler seals and then pull the top shroud and clean the fins of any debris and flashing from the original casting. Tighten up the bolts that hold on the top case cover/fan mount.
Wash every thing down and paint the engine metal, tune it up and drive it!!
Start the mods with a new dual exhausts system. Re-jet the carbs up a notch - the newer gas needs that.

Enjoy!
Danny Davis driving "air cooled" since the 1960s...
Pierce County, Washington, U.S.A. (near Tacoma) 2O6-643-67I8
Corvairs NorthWest, North Cascades Corvairs, Corvanatics, CORSA Western Director
Freejax
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Freejax »

100_2900.JPG
Here are some pictures view master, hope this helps you. I did not want to peel into it to deep.
Thanks to all of you for the great advise, I am still in deep thought as to how far I want to go on my engine. Someone said you can spend $10,000 on these engines and really get minimal HP out of them. I will keep you posted on the progress and most lily pick your brains again for more advise.
Thanks.

Oh PS the oil drain plug is not all the way in because I just drained the oil and when I went to put it back in it felt a little gritty, I did not want to damage the threads, I have not put new oil in yet because of not knowing what to do to the engine yet. The comment made me chuckle though.
Happy Building all!
Freejax
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Freejax »

100_2898.JPG
As you can tell I have a little interior and trim work to sort out.
Happy Building all!
Freejax
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:39 pm

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by Freejax »

100_2897.JPG
Hope these pics help you out.
Happy Building all!
User avatar
viewmaster
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 1:34 pm
Location: Fresno, CA

Re: Not So Disappointed!!

Post by viewmaster »

Thanks for the pix Freejax, I wish you (and myself) all the luck on your refurb. LOL. Thanks again.
'65 '500' Sedan 110 PG
'65 Monza Sedan "Turbo'd" 110 SU conversion 4sp Manual'
Post Reply

Return to “Introductions”