LM vs. EM Debate.
EM vs LM Debate
Why debate! Earlies Rule!!! :lol:
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 7:26 pm
- Location: Connelly Springs, NC
- Contact:
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
Don Yenko never built an early Stinger... LATE MODELS RULE!!!
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
There can be no doubt since I have an LM.
Paul Beck
Paul Beck
Re: EM vs LM Debate
hmmm...bettter check those poll results...looks like the Lates are winning. ;)scout1977 wrote:Why debate! Earlies Rule!!! :lol:
Scott
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
Where's the "Meh...If I had the space I'd have both" choice? :)
-
- Corvair of the Month
- Posts: 745
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 5:50 am
- Location: Maine
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
I have one of each. Tuff decision.
1966 Corsa convertible, 140, 4sp.
1965 Monza Convertible, 110, PG.
Dirigo Corvair group.
http://www.dirigocorvairs.net/
1965 Monza Convertible, 110, PG.
Dirigo Corvair group.
http://www.dirigocorvairs.net/
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
You left out " My Dad can beat up your Mom " as a voting option ! ;)
Is there really anything to " Debate " ????? :mrgreen:
Seriously -- I've always been a " Late Guy " but it has more to do with the rear suspension than anything else. Actually my driving ( or even riding) in an Early is VERY limited to a brief straight drive (Whew!) from the Concours at the Detroit convention to the host hotel and then a ride around the autocross with Rick loving in his Sprint . I still shake and tremble and have Flashbacks about that ride !!!!! 8-)
Actually the look of the Early Coupes is growing on me . :|
In the end -- I like all cars !!!!!
"UNSAFE"
Is there really anything to " Debate " ????? :mrgreen:
Seriously -- I've always been a " Late Guy " but it has more to do with the rear suspension than anything else. Actually my driving ( or even riding) in an Early is VERY limited to a brief straight drive (Whew!) from the Concours at the Detroit convention to the host hotel and then a ride around the autocross with Rick loving in his Sprint . I still shake and tremble and have Flashbacks about that ride !!!!! 8-)
Actually the look of the Early Coupes is growing on me . :|
In the end -- I like all cars !!!!!
"UNSAFE"
- Attachments
-
- 216.jpg (32.4 KiB) Viewed 30058 times
Kevin Willson
1965 Monza 3.1
Juneau Alaska
1965 Monza 3.1
Juneau Alaska
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
EM are best because there were no LM FC, no LM ultravans(?), no LM boats and no LM wagons.
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
ok, how in the world do I add a picture? Hopefully this works....
- Attachments
-
- my rustbucket!
- grn2.jpg (9.18 KiB) Viewed 30040 times
Re: LM vs. EM Debate.
Apples and Oranges! But I love them both.
- sweet66monza
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 6:32 pm
Re: EM vs LM Debate
S&DDrafting wrote:hmmm...bettter check those poll results...looks like the Lates are winning. ;)
only cuz lates are by far the best!!
Cody Hurley
www.cchvintageauto.com
Post Falls, ID
66 monza convertible 140/pg loaded with options
66 corsa coupe 180/4sp 3rd owner
66 Canadian monza coupe 110/pg
65 monza coupe 110/4 daily driver
www.cchvintageauto.com
Post Falls, ID
66 monza convertible 140/pg loaded with options
66 corsa coupe 180/4sp 3rd owner
66 Canadian monza coupe 110/pg
65 monza coupe 110/4 daily driver
- atwistedgrip
- Corvair of the Month
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Sat Dec 12, 2009 5:26 pm
Re: LM vs. EM Debate.
I prefer the look of an EM 4 doors and a LM 2 door... but that's another debate.
Besides, I'm not sure my oppinion counts. I've never owned a car yet... I'm a FC guy.
Besides, I'm not sure my oppinion counts. I've never owned a car yet... I'm a FC guy.
- gabbagabbawill
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 1:12 pm
Re: EM vs LM Debate
I'm not sure that they're truly more popular, but I'm sure there are a lot more of the LM around, thus skewing the results a bit. ;)
Personally, I have no desire for a LM, but love my EM coupe and really want a rampy.
Hey, the EM will have it's 50th anniversary soon!! :D
Personally, I have no desire for a LM, but love my EM coupe and really want a rampy.
Hey, the EM will have it's 50th anniversary soon!! :D
Re: EM vs LM Debate
I WAS an LM ONLY guy, till I got a '64 coupe in a "package deal". I am really liking the EM and I haven't even been able drive it yet. ;)gabbagabbawill wrote:I'm not sure that they're truly more popular, but I'm sure there are a lot more of the LM around, thus skewing the results a bit. ;)
Personally, I have no desire for a LM, but love my EM coupe and really want a rampy.
Hey, the EM will have it's 50th anniversary soon!! :D
Scott
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
Re: LM vs. EM Debate. I dare you!
You can vote for both. (even if you don't have the room for them ;) )b-vair wrote:Where's the "Meh...If I had the space I'd have both" choice? :)
Scott
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)