Ive not experienced any of this with my 63 although i havent driven it hard.
Im a Fuel Truck Driver, not a Race Car Driver. That could have something to do with it. The Corvair feels small enough to put under the hood of my big truck. Lol
LM vs. EM Debate.
Re: LM vs. EM Debate.
Jerry...
1963 Corvair Monza Convertible 140 4 speed.
Colorado Springs
1963 Corvair Monza Convertible 140 4 speed.
Colorado Springs

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.
So I guess I dont get a vote as I only know the EM.
Jerry...
1963 Corvair Monza Convertible 140 4 speed.
Colorado Springs
1963 Corvair Monza Convertible 140 4 speed.
Colorado Springs

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.
I had to vote for...BOTH. It depends on what a person wants. I had my share of each (plus 3 driver vans). For driving, performance, (maybe) looks, yeah, late model takes it. For classic looks, it's the early model with that wrap around windshield, especially for a convertible. I honestly think the early styling made me pull the trigger when it came to buying mine. There was also something about "1962", the first year for convertibles. Dennis
Re: LM vs. EM Debate.
I think there is a disparity here that's not been discussed. Since there were more EMs made, they would theoretically have a numerical advantage in the voting. How to balance?
Scott
Scott
Re: LM vs. EM Debate.
I'm casting a write-in vote for Forward Controls, especially Rampsides.