LM vs. EM Debate.

Anything Corvair related

LM vs. EM

LM's are best.
272
43%
EM's are best.
279
44%
My Dad can beat up your Dad.
88
14%
 
Total votes: 639

User avatar
Scott H
Site Admin
Posts: 4179
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Hesperia, CA

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Scott H »

I think a better (way more co$tly of course) solution would be to take a 4-door and make it into a 2-door. That would give the larger c-pillar they were trying to go for. It would have not been cost effective for Sprints or Stingers back then obviously but it would make a nice custom project for someone to do now. :)
Scott
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
User avatar
Gregory_Miller
Corvair of the Month
Corvair of the Month
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:54 pm

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Gregory_Miller »

I think the Yenko and Fitch treatments spoil the lines of the car. I'm not a stocker purist, but I don't go for the big fender flares, rear deck lid spoilers, but a functional not too "flashy" front spoiler that is effective rocks my boat. Non-stock wheels, yes too... But I'm still mostly a LM guy. Except for the wagons.
User avatar
Corvair.crazy
Corvair of the Month
Corvair of the Month
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 8:22 am
Location: McMinnville, Oregon

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Corvair.crazy »

mart wrote:I was hoping this thread would help me decide which type to buy.....but it hasnt.....I like both in coupe form, and I agree that fitting the right wheels makes a lot of difference to the looks , but does anyone know how to make an LM fitch sprint look good? That roof is a no-no....and Yenko side glass cover is no better.... why spoil such perfect lines for the sake of change?
I think you should buy two. One each...Ha HA! Seriously I think from what I read and listened too, the LM's are more sporty and handle better with EM being more a Nostalgia thing or some connection like that. No help with your queston though.
Jon
CORSA member
1962 Spyder convert
1961 Rampside
User avatar
65Ragtop
Posts: 465
Joined: Fri Jul 30, 2010 5:45 pm
Location: Arizona

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by 65Ragtop »

Is it my imagination or are EM's gaining some ground? :chevy:
Mike S.
65 Corsa 140 Ragtop
CORSA member
User avatar
Gregory_Miller
Corvair of the Month
Corvair of the Month
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:54 pm

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Gregory_Miller »

It's your imagination. :assault:
Motornoggin
Corvair of the Year
Corvair of the Year
Posts: 271
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 8:19 pm
Location: Laramie, WY.

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Motornoggin »

Die hard LM guy, but I restored an EM four door for my grandpa and seeing some of the REALLY NICE EM's here, I can appreciate them all.
User avatar
Trip
Posts: 940
Joined: Tue Aug 03, 2010 5:59 pm
Location: Lake Ariel, PA

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Trip »

Show these guys some EM coupes with wide wheels, fat tires, and an aggresive stance. That is what changed my mind about earlies. Kinda wish it didn't, then I wouldn't have to find myself a spyder coupe to restore!

Gotta say, I really like having one early and one late in the garage =)
Attachments
cars.JPG
Ray "Trip" Rodriguez III
Gouldsboro, PA
66 Corsa 140 coupe
65 Corsa 180 Turbocharged coupe
64 Monza Convertible
61 Air conditioned Monza coupe (Missy's)
See them here: https://tinyurl.com/ydc7txrf
User avatar
CARGOIL
Posts: 137
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 11:02 pm
Location: Sun City Ca.

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by CARGOIL »

keep on keepin on with those earlies.
User avatar
SwampThing
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 8:10 pm

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by SwampThing »

Should've had a FC box in there. They are in a world of their own
User avatar
cvair4life
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:22 am
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by cvair4life »

SwampThing wrote:Should've had a FC box in there. They are in a world of their own

agree'd.. welcome... love the car in your avatar pic :) It's got character
1966 Corsa Coupe
User avatar
cvair4life
Posts: 802
Joined: Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:22 am
Location: San Antonio, TX

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by cvair4life »

snddrafting wrote:Since I have one of each... I'll vote for both.

Dude you have way more than 1 of each... lol... I saw them
1966 Corsa Coupe
User avatar
Scott H
Site Admin
Posts: 4179
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 5:21 pm
Location: Hesperia, CA

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Scott H »

LOL. at that time there was only one of each ;)

Now there's five of them. They keep multiplying.
Scott
1960 Monza Coupe
1965 Evening Orchid Corsa Turbo (project)
1961 Rampside (project)
1964 Spyder coupe (patina car, running)
1964 faux Spyder (project/parts car)
1964 Monza (parts car)
1963 Monza (parts car)
User avatar
62pnlVan
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 7:53 am

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by 62pnlVan »

For a long time I've preferred the LM's. Then I saw a nice 64 at the Fan Belt Toss with a LM rear suspension. Since there are always more EM's for sale cheap on craigslist around here than LM's I started imagining the possibilities for hot rodding an EM once it had the better LM rear suspension. Just to be different. I've never seen an early with a Crown conversion. At a Corvair show I was looking a LM coupe parked next to a EM 4 door and noticed that the bottom edge of the rear window is further back than on the LM. Which made me wonder if a Toronado drivetrain conversion into an EM would result in the carb being under the glass instead of the rear cowl. The rear doors would make engine access easy also. Installing the LM suspension in the EM, the trailing links could be moved inward to allow for some really wide wheels and tires. It would be so much fun to pull up next to some Mustang or Camaro in a flat roofed EM 4door with that Buick big block rumbling in the back seat.
User avatar
UNSAFE
Corvair of the Year
Corvair of the Year
Posts: 2006
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 1:19 pm

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by UNSAFE »

It looks like some of the early guys are voting twice ::-):
Attachments
original.jpg
original.jpg (64.4 KiB) Viewed 10801 times
Kevin Willson
1965 Monza 3.1
Juneau Alaska
brmstn69
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 2:16 am

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by brmstn69 »

Tough choice...

Early models had more of a variety of body styles and were classier looking, even the sedans and wagons had a classy and more upscale look to them.

The later model sedans look odd to me, but they handle better and the coupes and convertibles are downright sexy...
User avatar
Gregory_Miller
Corvair of the Month
Corvair of the Month
Posts: 919
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 1:54 pm

Re: LM vs. EM Debate.

Post by Gregory_Miller »

Scott Howey wrote:Now there's five of them. They keep multiplying.
Time to get them "fixed" or you'll end up with a dozen of them! Or, simply seperate the boys from the girls...
Post Reply

Return to “Corvair Talk”