Yes it was a hotter coil and it tended to result in shorter points life. GM/Deco developed a better coil that worked with the standard 1.8 ohm ballast. This coil (#1115202) was also used on the 140HP engines. Years ago a few Corvair guys tested different coils for maximum spark gap and the 140HP/turbo coil performed better than the so-called HOT coils from Pertronix and other "HOT" coil companies. The #1115202 is unobtainable now, obsolete. I've heard a company makes a reproductions for Corvette engines - not sure if this is true.RexJohnson wrote: ↑Sat Mar 02, 2024 10:45 am '63 Spyders also used the external ballast resistor. I think that the '62 and '3 Spyders used a "hotter" coil and my guess is that a different resistance value was needed with this coil and so it was easier to just use the external resistor. I was probably lees confusing on the assembly line also.
That 62-3 turbo ballast and coil was also used on the Hi output SBC engine in the Corvette and Chevy issued a technical bulletin #557 to the dealers to change the ballast from 0.3 ohm to 1.8 ohm. Customers were complaining the engines would not stay in tune due to the short points life. Frankly the SBC engine was built for competition, but to qualify the engine Chevy had to sell it to anyone. It was a lousy daily street engine. The change back to a 1.8 ohm ballast solved the points problem (for street use), but of course the engines lost high RPM power due to lower coil output at high RPM. In a turbo engine boost increases air resistance across the spark plug gap and a higher voltage is needed at maximum boost.
Oddly the Corvair was NEVER mentioned in the dealer bulletin even though the turbo had the same ballast and coil as the Corvette Hi-Po enigne.